| TO CAPT Caspius, CAPT Thiessen CC LTJG Oshiro FROM LCDR Sedai SUBJ Personnel records of Tierno, Rianni |
Good evening, Captains.
It was brought to my attention that there is an effective personnel records disaster in regards to Cadet Rianni Tierno's materials. I have discussed with operations and medical on proposals to rectify the situation and here is what we've come up with:
Cadet Tierno's record from the time she originally went MIA up until she was recently recovered should be expunged and extricated to a classified file under Federation contact JUNAYD-001RT.
This should include ALL medical entries, physical and mental, log entries, access entries, etc. This would also include the entire year's worth of academy classwork, as well as career recognition, awards, official reprimands, and penalty records.
We recommend that the most recent medical entry, which clears Tierno for duty, should be amended due to its comparisons to an entity whose medical information should be considered irrelevant to the cadet's. While this changes nothing about the actual results, for the sake of record integrity and formality, Tierno's health should be judged wholly on its own merits and references to the replacement should not be included. A new physical may be ordered and completed at Medical's earliest convenience or adjustments made to the current evaluation on record.
In terms of the cadet's continuance at the Academy Annex, in the Federation's experience with other memory implantation scenarios, possession of memories does not necessarily equal experience or total understanding. We suggest the cadet be allowed to test out of any classes that her record formerly indicated she has taken.
My evaluation of the cadet is attached. I remain available for questions and concerns.
//SIGNED//
LCDR Sedai, Katriel
DS13 Counseling
--
Spoiler: attachmentShow
EVALUATOR'S NAME: Sedai, Katriel E.
AUTHORITY: Head of Counseling, Deep Space 13
SUBJECT'S NAME: Tierno, Rianni
INTERVIEW STARDATE: 95111.1
PURPOSE AND CONTEXT OF EVALUATION
Determine subject's state of mental health for restoration to active duty.
CONCLUSION
Authority finds subject to be of sound mental health and fit for active duty.
DISCUSSION
As this process of memory implantation is new as far as the authority's knowledge extends, authority placed the subject under neurological analysis during interview, in an effort to obtain greater understanding of the implantation process of foreign memories, as well as the subject's integration of foreign memories.
Though the subject retains and recalls the foreign memories as if they are her own and a part of her, she quite clearly assigns the actions and feelings from those memories to another entity and retains no sense of responsibility or credit for events that occurred. Subject references the time as 'stolen' from her and desires, to a small degree, justice for what feels like a crime committed against her.
The subject's reaction to her own traumatic memories is very different and reflects the physiological reality of her body being kept in stasis and unable to dream, process time or gain emotional distance. Authority and subject discussed one of the more difficult topics and gave the subject some actionable tasks to assist with trauma processing and integration.
The authority disagrees on the existing medical interpretation of the subject's neurological scans: rather than assume a neural link was created between the subject and another entity, authority suggests the purpose of the found neurochemicals was to stimulate integration of the foreign memories as the subject's own, as they were implanted en masse by some unknown procedure. Given clear evidence that the subject was in complete stasis, this would make known methods of telepathic links with the subject completely non-viable, as a minimum of brain activity is required from both individuals. Given the fixed and known time span of the implanted memories, it is theoretically possible that the memories could be extricated and removed, but when asked, subject was firmly disinterested in the possibility of such a procedure like this.
Subject was also prescribed a sleep aid.
LENGTH OF INTERVIEW: 2 hrs
END OF EVALUATION.
//ATTACHMENT// RTIERNO-neurocranial-95111.scans
