Officer Observation Reviews

PERSONNEL DIRECTORY

((#Information Post))

A


B


Ban, Writ
Barid, Linore

C


D


E


F


G


H


I


Izly, Josi

J


K


L


Loxton, Nicholas

M


MacGinnis, Quinn
MacLeod, James
Murphy, Adelaide

N


O


Odi, Tysir

P


Q


R


Rahn, Naderi

S


Salene, Na’Toth

T


Tolar, Amathel

U


V


W


Warner, Ruke
Wescott, Evelynn
Wilminuo, Timeer

X


Y


Yont

Z


1 Like

Officer observations are an optional part of the post-recruitment process and may be used at any time for one character to to give IC feedback/reviews of another character’s work on missions or other events.

If you would like one of these for one of your characters, it is best to work and arrange for one ahead of the designated event, so that the character writing the evaluation can take some notes on your character’s performance during the mission.

The following template has been provided in order to assist with writing more objective reviews.

Template Code
<div class="report starfleet"><div class="logo"></div>

<div><mark>Stardate:</mark><br />
12345.6

</div><div><mark>Officer Observation Review:</mark><br>
(observed officer's name here)

</div><div><mark>Filed By:</mark><br />
CMDR Yourname, Here

</div></div>

[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]Please specify the observed officer's role during this observation period:[/color][/font]
(what did the observed officer do for this mission)

[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]Please specify your role during this observation period:[/color][/font]
(what did your character do for this mission)

<hr>

[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.[/color][/font]

<table>
<tr>
<td>

[font=Play]PERFORMANCE TRAIT[/font]

</td>
</td><td>
<td> # * </td>
</tr><tr>

<td>

[font=Play]SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS[/font]
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

</td><td></td><td>

#

</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE[/font]
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

</td><td></td><td>

#

</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP[/font]
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

</td><td></td><td>

#

</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING[/font]
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

</td><td></td><td>

#


</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]ROLE MODELING[/font]
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

</td><td></td><td>

#

</td></tr></table>

[indent]
[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=#dd2423]1.0[/color] Below Standards
[color=#ddd123]2.0[/color] Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
[color=#239edd]4.0[/color] Above Standards
[color=#6cdd23]5.0[/color] Greatly Exceeds Standards
[/font]
[/indent]


<hr>

[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.[/color][/font]

<table><tr><td>

[font=Play]QUALITY[/font]

</td><td></td><td>

[font=Play]OBSERVED Y/N?[/font]

</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]FORTITUDE[/font]
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

</td><td></td><td>

Yes; I felt that the Captain remained very calm and clearheaded despite the crisis caused by the Ambit-6's collision with the Vanguard. He acted quickly to recover both their survivors while still capturing the smuggler vessel.

</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY[/font]
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

</td><td></td><td>


</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]PRUDENCE[/font]
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

</td><td></td><td>


</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]JUSTICE/FAIRNESS[/font]
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

</td><td></td><td>




</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]TRUSTWORTHINESS[/font]
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

</td><td></td><td>



</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]RESPECT[/font]
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

</td><td></td><td>



</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]CARING[/font]
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

</td><td></td><td>



</td></tr><tr><td>

[font=Play]CITIZENSHIP[/font]
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr></table>

[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer 
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:[/color][/font]


[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:[/color][/font]


[font=Ubuntu Mono][color=orange]IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:[/color][/font]


[font=Ubuntu Mono]END OF REVIEW.[/font]
Example review
Stardate:
93426
Officer Observation Review:
CAPT Konieczko
Filed By:
LT Punch

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
CAPT Konieczko was the commanding officer of the USS Vanguard.

Please specify your role during this observation period:
I was on sensors duty on the bridge station.


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

5.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

3.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

5.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; I felt that the Captain remained very calm and clearheaded despite the crisis caused by the Ambit-6’s collision with the Vanguard. He acted quickly to recover both their survivors while still capturing the smuggler vessel.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

Yes; Despite the fact that the World Guard had been completely uncooperative throughout their interactions with us, the Captain still offered to work together with them jointly on interrogating the captured smugglers. That seemed exceptional to me.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

Not sure. I keep thinking about the collision with the Ambit-6 and how it could have been avoided, but I don’t know that it could have been possible. We could have been less pro-active, I guess, and let the World Guard do it and only assist them indirectly, but that doesn’t seem like the Starfleet way either.

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
CAPT Konieczko communicated really well with crew members on the bridge and with the USS October, which was also on the task force. They kept each other updated frequently and coordinated decisions.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
https://argo.ex-astris.net/t/aar-co-op-vanguard/30353691
https://argo.ex-astris.net/t/aar-co-op-october-4-june-2017/30349353

END OF REVIEW.

1 Like

((this post has been intentionally left blank))

1 Like
Stardate:
97143.3
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
CAPT MacLeod, James
Filed By:
CAPT Somek, Vorir

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Commanded ops on USS Republic during response to distress call

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding officer, USS Republic


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

5.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

4.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes. Despite combat conditions, the Captain was able to remain calm and work efficiently.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes. The Captain provided suggestions and even prepared to carry them out if approved, but did so without compromising his current orders and duties.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes. Despite being of equal rank to this officer, the Captain took and carried out orders immediately.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

After our encounter, in which we assisted and defended allied ships, the Captain raised suspicions about their reasons for being in the system at the time. I believe this was harmless and that the Captain has good intentions, but I would remind him that trust and compassion are key values in Starfleet and the Federation.

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
AAR: Response to Distress Call

END OF REVIEW.

3 Likes
Stardate:
97152.8
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
LT Loxton, Nicholas
Filed By:
LTJG Niazov, Sonya

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Lieutenant Loxton carried out his usual duties as a security officer, conducting usual rounds and interacting with the public.

Please specify your role during this observation period:
This officer shadowed the lieutenant, staying out of the way and in the background as much as possible.


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

3.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; The lieutenant modified his approach to problem-solving depending on the situation and whom he was speaking to. Keeping his audience in mind, he approached a problem differently when dealing with adolescents than he had when dealing with adults.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes; The lieutenant seemed to have some interest in engaging with the community he is entrusted to safeguard during earlier parts of the patrol. Encouraging this behavior would be positive for maintaining order and keeping ties to the community.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS: All scoring has been made from the assumption that an officer scoring at 3 reached the threshold expected of them as a security officer aboard Deep Space 13 and should be treated as satisfactory.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach: On Call Response | M&H Store, Deck 15

END OF REVIEW.

3 Likes
Stardate:
97183.1
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
ENS Izly, Josi
Filed By:
CMDR Jarnefelt, Charlotte

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Ensign Izly attened to multiple patients during a very busy period in sickbay as well as assisting with badly wounded patients from a frieghter accident who were infected with the virus

Please specify your role during this observation period:
As Chief Medical Officer I was coordinating sickbay and helping to attend to patients


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

3.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

4.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; Ensign Izly was faced with a very tough task, and despite at times seeing some nerves on her face, she did not let this interfere with her duty and treated her patients well.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; Ensign Izly made the approiate and correct choices to treat her patients.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Yes; Like any starfleet medical officer Ensign Izly showed compassion and empathy toward her patients.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes; Ensign Izly adhered to her duties as starfleet medical officer well.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
Ensign Izly quickly adapted to changes in sickbay. Going from treating a simple case of nausea to quickly adapting to having to care for a patient going into cardiac arrest she will do well in her career. Her scores may seem low, however this is because she performed to the standard expected of any starfleet medical officer, and in the future in other situations these scores will likely be higher.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
AAR: Flower Power

END OF REVIEW.

4 Likes
Stardate:
97201.8
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
LTCMD Quinn MacGinnis
Filed By:
CAPT MacLeod, James

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
LTCMD Assisted with the interrogation and system analysis of the Rimward Logistics company

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer of the Spartacus Task Force.


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

2

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; MacGinniss faced a challenging situation where his skills were put to the test. The challenge did ultimately result in a defeat of his skills which did deal a blow to his ego, which he is learning from.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes, When faced with an outside incursion. MacGinnis new when to cut his losses and to predict the over all integrity of the data and our mission.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS: Often I am reminded of Captain Picard’s wisdom. It is possible to make no mistakes and still lose. That is not weakness, that’s life. The failure in Rimward Systems dealt a blow to his self esteem, from which I believe he can choose to learn and grow from and become not only a better systems expert, but an even better officer.

[font=Ubuntu Mono]IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:AAR Rimward Investigation

END OF REVIEW.

1 Like
Stardate:
97685.4
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
CAPT Barid, Linore
Filed By:
CAPT Holmes, A./CMDR S'Vesta, J.

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Tactical Mission Specialist / Commander of Rescue Mission

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Dallas / Executive Officer, U.S.S. Dallas


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.5

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

4.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

5.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

4.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes, Captain Barid remained calm and collected amidst unforgiving odds, should the situation devolve into a conflict.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes, while Captain Barid appears to have a very tactically and combat orientated outlook, he stayed his hand during a crucial engagement of the KCW.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes, see above.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

While Captain Barid performed his duties and orders admirably to prevent the Federation being pulled into the KCW conflict, he did attempt to deceive Captain Jural of the Mo’kai vessel regarding the survivors of the Urzva. (Add. notes below)

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Note above

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes, Captain Barid showed respect and courtesy towards Dallas and guest crew alike, during his communications with the Klingon vessels, despite the deception, the Captain remained courteous and respectful of the situation at hand.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

At times Captain Barid did assume that the rescued crew from the Urzva were prisoners, however was quick to correct himself.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

N/A

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

While I cannot say if I would have done any different myself, hindsight being what it is, rather than deflecting requests from Captain Jural for the return of the Urzva crew, I would have admitted they were aboard our Runabout and requested they return to the Dallas for treatment, inviting Captain Jural to remain until the crew had been restored to health, so we could ascertain the correct process for repatriation to Klingon space. Regardless, so far the outcome appears to have been for the best.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

END OF REVIEW.

4 Likes
Stardate:
97692.5
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
LTJG Rahn, Naderi
Filed By:
CAPT Holmes, Alexandria

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Acting Chief Medical Officer, U.S.S. Dallas

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Dallas


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

5.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.5

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

4.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

5.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

4.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; Lieutenant Rahn acted in a consistent and collected manor when treating her patients.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

N/A

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; the Lieutenant was quick to react to a changing dynamic which threatened to jeopardise the wellbeing of a patient, enacting swift recovery of the patient in question.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

Yes, the Lieutenant attended to her patients appropriately and with no prejudice for their potential allegiances.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

As above

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

As above

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Yes; Lieutenant Rahn has an exceptional bedside manor and was able to obtain key information from her patients without disrupting her caregiving.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

As above

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
I am not a medical officer so while I can speak of the results (all five patients have been restored to a healthy state with non-critical conditions) I cannot speak of the methods. However none of the patients exhibited any signs of distress or discomfort in relation to the treatment provided by Lieutenant Rahn.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

END OF REVIEW.

2 Likes
Stardate:
97781.3
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
CMDR Na'Toth Saleme
Filed By:
CAPT Andrej A. Timoreev

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Ajilon - away team member

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Attar - away team member


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

4.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

3.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

4.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes: the Commander proved herelf calm even while the situation was getting harder to deal with and a fellow officer was in danger.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes: the Commander showed a remarkable ability not to let personal feelings affect or otherwise cloud judgment. Due to the peculiar nature of the situation in which we found ourselves operating as an away team (the Commander being a Klingon, dealing with people who had just killed many Klingons), it is this Officer's opinion that such a behavior is to be considered doubly commendable.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes: while the Commander first attempts at drawing attention away from Capt. Mirazuni in order, in his opinion, to ease her own task, were clumsy, to say the least, she showed an ability to immediately reassess the situation and adapting her behavior accordingly.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

No: the mission did not allow for specific observations concerning the observed officer's attitude in this field.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Yes: the Commander behaved according to Starfleet standards for the whole duration of the mission, dealing with the other officers involved with the utmost honesty. While she attempted deceiving some of the station personnel, she did so under mission parameters.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes: the Commander showed a well-preserved balance in dealing with all people the away team met, even under hard circumstances.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Yes: the Commander did not refrain from offering her help when Capt. Mirazuni was in danger.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes: as already mentioned above, the Commander behaved as a competent, well-disciplined, and committed Starfleet officer.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

The Commander’s first attempts at attracting attention away from Capt. Mirazuni, as previously mentioned, were clumsy and ineffective, perhaps due to a bit of excessive ‘theatrality’. However, those actions have not hampered the mission nor the observed Officer’s effectiveness during it.

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
None

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
AAR: Orion Today, Gorn Tomorrow

END OF REVIEW.

2 Likes
Stardate:
98063.2
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
ENS Murphy, Adelaide Mary
Filed By:
CAPT Mirazuni, A

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Bridge Officer, Ops Console

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Endeavour


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

5.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

5.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

2.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
The Ensign performed her duties well, integrating with the rest of the team and following orders. Acted on own initiative where appropriate. High degree of professionalism on duty. Could improve by preparing fully, especially when serving on a posting different to her own usual posting.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

AAR: Tempting Temporal Transports

END OF REVIEW.

3 Likes
Stardate:
98406.9
OFFICER OBSERVATION REVIEW:
LCDR Odi, T.
Filed By:
LCDR Blake, K.

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Acting Chief Engineer, U.S.S. Atlantis

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Acting Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Atlantis


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes, Lieutenant Commander Odi remained calm and did not succumb to speculation during our yellow alert situation.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes, as above.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes, Lieutenant Commander Odi was able to correctly identify and carry out modifications to the Atlantis’ sensor array which allowed us to complete the mission in an accelerated timeframe.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

Yes, Lieutenant Commander Odi remained resolute and kept his speculation in check during a critical point in the mission.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Yes, as stated.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

N/A

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

N/A

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

N/A

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer that you disagree with, please state them here and why:
None.

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
Lieutenant Commander Odi dealt with the situation in a manner I would expect of senior members of Deep Space 13 crew, his skilful manipulation of the Atlantis sensor array to provide a quick resolution to a potentially dangerous situation is commendable.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

END OF REVIEW.

4 Likes
Stardate:
98522.2
Officer Observation Review:
LTJG Yont
Filed By:
CAPT Mirazuni, A

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Medical doctor on away team

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Officer i/c of mission


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

3.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

None observed

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes. The officer was patient and responsible when dealing with patients and vaccinations.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

None observed

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

None observed

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

None observed

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes. Officer was respectful to patients and fellow colleagues during this mission.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

None observed

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

The officer carried out his duties to the full values that is expected of a medical officer in Starfleet.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

The officer performed as expected of any Starfleet officer. To improve, the officer should try to make sure his mannerisms and statements match his ability.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

AAR: Return to Anides V

END OF REVIEW.

OOC Sorry for the delay in this, RL got in the way. This has been backdated to match the AAR date.

Stardate:
99030.0
Officer Observation Review:
UHLAN WILMINUO, TIMEER
Filed By:
Lieutenant Commander Kiff Southerland

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Assist in Repair of Singularity Generators for Long Range Scanner Network.

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Repair of Singularity Generators for Long Range Scanner Network.


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

#5.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

#5.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

#5.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

#5.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

#5.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; Uhlan Wilminuo demonstrated excellent reserve when faced with an IED located in the final workstation, and was able to proceed back to the task at hand once the threat was neutralized.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes; Uhlan Wilminuo presented himself with dignity and discipline during the away mission.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

N/A;

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

N/A;

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Yes; For a time we were able to split up to achieve multiple tasks, with Uhlan Wilminuo maintaining to his assigned duties unsupervised.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes; Uhlan Wilminuo was very respectful at all times during our mission.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

N/A

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes; Uhlan acted in a manner that would make me proud to work alongside him again.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

No

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
Though our time was short, and mostly dedicated to work, Uhlan was personable and easy to work with, even engaging in light conversation during walks between tasks. Any Starbase Department or Starship would be lucky to have him as an officer.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
((No AAR Written, IG Transcript Here))

END OF REVIEW.

OOC Got together aboard USS Alexander for a quick introduction, then played out the non-combat Patrol Mission: Mission: Elvren System Patrol - Official Star Trek Online Wiki while taking some creative liberties with the ‘Plot’. Wilminuo was very responsive during our hour and a half mission together and was genuinely a pleasure to RP with!

Stardate:
99440.9
Officer Observation Review:
ENS Ban, Writ
Filed By:
CMDR Sedai, Katriel

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:

  1. Assisted in power failure diagnosis and restoration.
  2. Holosimulation drill

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Reyga bridge command


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; while the situation was not excessively dangerous, it was unexpected and for an officer who has not been on duty long, Ban kept a level head throughout.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; Ban demonstrated initiative in suggesting courses of action he could take and did not wait around to be ordered.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

Observed one incident where Ban evidently initiated unwelcome telepathic contact and was forcefully rebuffed by the other party.

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS: Ensign Ban shows significant promise.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach: n/a

END OF REVIEW.

2 Likes
Stardate:
99478.8
Officer Observation Review:
CMDR Warner, Ruke
Filed By:
CAPT Tungsten, Drake

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Commander Warner was on loan from Starbase DS13 to observe contact with the Citali, and offer security assistance, should it be needed.

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Captain, USS Dragon, lead ship for this mission.


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

4.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

4.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes; The Commander’s delivery of unusual circumstances to the bridge crew was very timely, and calm, with ready recommendations.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; Security recommendation was correct for the situation.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

Yes

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Yes; All relevant information was presented accurately.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes; The Commander was quick to assist Doctor Sovum without pulling rank, despite only minimal first-aid training per Commander LaSalle’s observation on the away team.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Yes; See above comment on assisting the Doctor with a patient.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Yes; Relevant information delivered on the true identity of patient, but without any unnecessary judgements being made.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

N/A

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

Commander Warner has also be unofficially observed on prior missions by this officer, and conduct has been of consistently good quality.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

AAR: The Hero We Deserve

END OF REVIEW.

2 Likes
Stardate:
99613.5
Officer Observation Review:
CMDR Tolar, Amathel
Filed By:
CAPT Mirazuni, Ayesha

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Acting Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Mariner

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Visiting Observing Officer


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

3.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

3.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Y. As the situation deteriorated, the Commander remained calm and took careful decisions.

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Y. The Commander was a responsible commanding officer.

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Y. The Commander made choices that were positive to the outcome of the mission objectives.

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

N.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

Y. The Commander was open in all her dealings.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Y. The Commander treated others with respect and dignity.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Y. The Commander was caring to her crew.

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

Y. The Commander performed in accordance with Federation law and ethics.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

N/A

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

The Commander performed as expected for a Commanding Officer for this assignment. It is important to note the high level nature of the assignment when reading this report.

The Commander made careful decisions throughout, from appointing an Acting First Officer (the Chief Engineer, chosen because of his intimate knowledge of the ship, vital for this mission), to working alongside allies (another Starfleet vessel, a Romulan vessel, and an allied Cardassian Vessel). The Commander delegated responsibility, took risks when necessary to complete mission, but at no point risked the lives of her crew.

It is this officer’s opinion that the Commander has shown the qualities that elevate her from simply First Officer, to Commanding Officer level.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
AAR: Spoonfed

END OF REVIEW.

4 Likes
Stardate:
99706.6
Officer Observation Review:
LCDR Wescott, Evelynn
Filed By:
CAPT Vel, Lunya

Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
Visiting Medical Officer

Please specify your role during this observation period:
Commanding Officer- USS Midway


Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.

PERFORMANCE TRAIT

# *

SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.

3.0

RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.

4.0

TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.

3.0

PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.

4.0

ROLE MODELING
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.

3.0

1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards


Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.

QUALITY

OBSERVED Y/N?

FORTITUDE
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.

Yes; I observed the LCDR to be very calm under combat situations. Did not panic or display signs of extreme fear

TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.

Yes; I observed the LCDR immediately respond to Sick Bay when wounded were brought in and assistance was requested from attending staff doctor

PRUDENCE
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.

Yes; LCDR was the one to recommend bio-metric spoofing

JUSTICE/FAIRNESS
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.

TRUSTWORTHINESS
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.

RESPECT
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.

Yes; LCDR displayed appropriate respect for rank and positions while aboard ship.

CARING
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.

Yes; LCDR quickly responded to need for additional medical personnel and showed compassion and care towards the patients she treated

CITIZENSHIP
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.

IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:

ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
LCDR Wescott was instrumental in the decision to spoof sensors and to help hide LT Drush within the crew. This display of initiative is exactly what is looked for aboard ship and throughout Starfleet. LCDR/DR Wescott will make a fine addition to any medical staff.

IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:

AAR: Past Lives, Past Debts

END OF REVIEW.

1 Like