Sedai, Katriel E.
Head of Counseling, Deep Space 13
SUBJECT’S NAME: Max
INTERVIEW STARDATE: ((2 Nov 2020))
PURPOSE AND CONTEXT OF EVALUATION
Determine subject’s state of mental health for resuming active duty.
CONCLUSION
Authority finds subject to be of sound mental health and fit for active duty, with reservations.
DISCUSSION
At this time, authority acknowledges that subject’s case is a unique one and therefore difficult to assess by any normal standards for Starfleet personnel. Authority observes that the subject produces no discernable emotional output, which suggests the subject is unlikely to be governed by the cultural emotional norms and cues that sentients usually rely on to guide their own behavior.
Authority’s assessment is that the subject’s critical lack of self-awareness became evident over the course of the interview. Though he claimed that a lack of inability to ‘properly communicate’ with fellow officers to be the primary cause of conflicts, his responses on the BFI-2 conversely claim that he has above average conscientiousness. Apart from this, authority found it notable that the subject was unable to definitively state if he could act for the good of a social group, contrary to his own individual need.
Subject’s responses on other questions indicate that he seems to possess a primarily optimistic and positive worldview, with a heavily externalized locus of control. Remaining BFI-2 scores indicate an above average openness to experience, average extraversion, and a significantly below average negative emotionality.
LENGTH OF INTERVIEW: 1.5 hrs
END OF EVALUATION.