Sedai, Katriel E.
Head of Counseling, Deep Space 13
SUBJECT’S NAME: Jera
INTERVIEW STARDATE: ((2 Mar 2021))
PURPOSE AND CONTEXT OF EVALUATION
Basic Profile Assessment.
CONCLUSION
Authority finds subject to be of sound mental health and fit for active duty.
DISCUSSION
Authority observes that she had to spend a significant amount of interview time asking questions simply to understand the subject’s current socioemotional state, which is fairly complex and has very few medical precedents to draw from. Subject alternated between referring to himself as ‘I’ and ‘we’, evidence of the lack of clean disengagement between sense of self and his cooperative. While the authority empathizes with the subject’s decision to remain in his cooperative, there is some mild cause for concern if the eventual goal is for the cooperative units to separate and live individual lives.
Subject was capable of expressing his emotions visually, to a degree, sometimes smiling, sometimes twisting his features in mild distress, and occasionally these actions seem more practiced than familiar. Subject’s verbal communication style was also unusual and sometimes unclear; authority speculates that perhaps he is a bit too reliant on his connection with his cooperative that when he needs to interact with those outside of it, he potentially forgets to provide more context or information on what he’s communicating.
Subject trends towards mild optimism and moderately positive in world view and the motivations of others. Subject’s locus of control is more external than internal. BFI-2 scores: high openness to experience and conscientiousness, moderate agreeableness and extraversion, low negative emotionality.
LENGTH OF INTERVIEW: 1.5 hrs
END OF EVALUATION.