LT R'mori
Counselor, DS13
SUBJECT’S NAME: Toror, Thalos
INTERVIEW STARDATE: 100015.9
PURPOSE AND CONTEXT OF EVALUATION
Basic Profile Assessment
CONCLUSION
Authority finds subject to be of sound mental health and fit for active duty.
DISCUSSION
Subject is a recently-promoted starship Captain. Despite presenting as extremely personable and well-composed, subject has endured a non-insignificant amount of personal trauma throughout his life. Though good humor and an easy-going nature seem to have carried him through his experiences without creating a detriment to his daily life, there are certain areas where his views may be colored inappropriately negatively. In particular, subject harbors extremely negative feelings towards Orions, despite an intellectual understanding of not only the fact that those feelings are unhealthy, but also of their origin. Given subject’s demeanor, authority was surprised to learn of subject’s self-reported lack of close friends and family. Subject’s troubled childhood may account for difficulty forming connections in adulthood, though subject did seem quite open to the possibility of pursuing friendships and professional relationships in the future. Though it was difficult to pinpoint during actual conversation due to subject’s positivity, upon review authority is left somewhat concerned about the potential impact of command responsibility as an additional factor in subject’s isolation.
Overall, subject’s worldview and outlook on the motivations of others are highly optimistic. Subject’s self-esteem is likewise strong, as is his ability to develop an emotional support network, perhaps paradoxically so, given his acknowledged almost total lack of such a network at present. Locus of control is, perhaps unsurprisingly, decidedly external.
Subject’s personality profile scores were remarkably moderate in all areas. Though one might initially suspect this to be a result of self-mediating assessment responses, authority believes subject’s scores to be consistent with his personality as observed subjectively. Subject’s strongest area, rated moderate-to-high was conscientiousness, followed by extraversion - a score carried by both assertiveness and sociability, lending further confidence to the assessment of subject’s potential to form social connections, if not necessarily maintain them. This combination also likely contributes to subject’s command ability. Openness to experience and agreeableness both rated only slightly above average, with relatively balanced subscores. Authority believes this, too, likely contribute to a well-rounded command officer, capable of relatively easy switching between delegation and hands-on approaches. Subject’s only outlying rating is in negative emotionality which, corresponding well to subject’s optimism and resiliency, was kept from a null value only by a small amount of emotional volatility, attributable likely to the issues discussed above.
LENGTH OF INTERVIEW: 1.5 hrs
END OF EVALUATION.