Officer observations are an optional part of the post-recruitment process and may be used at any time for one character to to give IC feedback/reviews of another character’s work on missions or other events.
If you would like one of these for one of your characters, it is best to work and arrange for one ahead of the designated event, so that the character writing the evaluation can take some notes on your character’s performance during the mission.
The following template has been provided in order to assist with writing more objective reviews.
Template Code
<div class="report starfleet"><div class="logo"></div>
<div><mark>Stardate:</mark><br />
12345.6
</div><div><mark>Officer Observation Review:</mark><br>
(observed officer's name here)
</div><div><mark>Filed By:</mark><br />
CMDR Yourname, Here
</div></div>
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]Please specify the observed officer's role during this observation period:[/color][/font]
(what did the observed officer do for this mission)
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]Please specify your role during this observation period:[/color][/font]
(what did your character do for this mission)
<hr>
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.[/color][/font]
<table>
<tr>
<td>
[font=Play]PERFORMANCE TRAIT[/font]
</td>
</td><td>
<td> # * </td>
</tr><tr>
<td>
[font=Play]SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS[/font]
Avoided unnecessary risk of crew and equipment. Subordinates were never made to feel unsafe or concerned for their own well-being.
</td><td></td><td>
#
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE[/font]
Adapted to changing priorities. Handled unexpected situations and does so in a calm and positive manner.
</td><td></td><td>
#
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP[/font]
Overall fostered the effectiveness of others. Approachable, inclusive, and respectful. Communicated goals clearly to subordinates.
</td><td></td><td>
#
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING[/font]
Used good judgment when evaluating a problem. Analyzed risks and identified consequences. Made appropriate decisions in a timely manner. Showed consideration for the big picture and worked towards long-term opportunities.
</td><td></td><td>
#
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]ROLE MODELING[/font]
Conducted self in fair and trustworthy manner. Upheld professional and ethical standards. Demonstrated and inspired subordinates to organizational values including Integrity, Compassion, and Excellence.
</td><td></td><td>
#
</td></tr></table>
[indent]
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=#dd2423]1.0[/color] Below Standards
[color=#ddd123]2.0[/color] Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
[color=#239edd]4.0[/color] Above Standards
[color=#6cdd23]5.0[/color] Greatly Exceeds Standards
[/font]
[/indent]
<hr>
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.[/color][/font]
<table><tr><td>
[font=Play]QUALITY[/font]
</td><td></td><td>
[font=Play]OBSERVED Y/N?[/font]
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]FORTITUDE[/font]
Mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty, adversity, danger or temptation courageously; the strength of mind along with physical or moral courage to persevere in the face of adversity.
</td><td></td><td>
Yes; I felt that the Captain remained very calm and clearheaded despite the crisis caused by the Ambit-6's collision with the Vanguard. He acted quickly to recover both their survivors while still capturing the smuggler vessel.
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY[/font]
Self-discipline to control passions and appetites; being accountable, pursuing excellence, exercising self-restraint in action, statement; self-control.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]PRUDENCE[/font]
Practical wisdom and the ability to make the right choice in specific situations.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]JUSTICE/FAIRNESS[/font]
Honesty, lawfulness, keeping promises; adherence to a balanced standard of justice without relevance to one’s own feelings or inclinations.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]TRUSTWORTHINESS[/font]
Deserving of trust or confidence, dependable, reliable; honesty, integrity, loyalty; refraining from deception.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]RESPECT[/font]
Behavior toward others; civility, courtesy, decency, dignity, autonomy, tolerance, and acceptance; the prohibition of humiliation, manipulation, and exploitation.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]CARING[/font]
Honest expressions of benevolence and altruism.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
[font=Play]CITIZENSHIP[/font]
Character and behavior in terms of the duties, obligations and values of an officer in Starfleet.
</td><td></td><td>
</td></tr></table>
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:[/color][/font]
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:[/color][/font]
[font="Ubuntu Mono"][color=orange]IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:[/color][/font]
[font="Ubuntu Mono"]END OF REVIEW.[/font]Example review
93426
CAPT Konieczko
LT Punch
Please specify the observed officer’s role during this observation period:
CAPT Konieczko was the commanding officer of the USS Vanguard.
Please specify your role during this observation period:
I was on sensors duty on the bridge station.
Please rank the officer on their performance in all the following areas.
|
PERFORMANCE TRAIT |
# * | |
|
SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS |
4.0 | |
|
RESPONSIVE TO CHANGE |
4.0 | |
|
TEAMWORK AND LEADERSHIP |
5.0 | |
|
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING |
3.0 | |
|
ROLE MODELING |
5.0 |
1.0 Below Standards
2.0 Progressing
3.0 Meets Standards
4.0 Above Standards
5.0 Greatly Exceeds Standards
Consider the following list of qualities. If you feel you observed the Commander demonstrating any of these traits during the mission, please mark Y in the box. Comments on how this quality was demonstrated are additionally welcome.
|
QUALITY |
OBSERVED Y/N? | |
|
FORTITUDE |
Yes; I felt that the Captain remained very calm and clearheaded despite the crisis caused by the Ambit-6’s collision with the Vanguard. He acted quickly to recover both their survivors while still capturing the smuggler vessel. | |
|
TEMPERANCE/RESPONSIBILITY | ||
|
PRUDENCE | ||
|
JUSTICE/FAIRNESS |
Yes; Despite the fact that the World Guard had been completely uncooperative throughout their interactions with us, the Captain still offered to work together with them jointly on interrogating the captured smugglers. That seemed exceptional to me. | |
|
TRUSTWORTHINESS | ||
|
RESPECT |
Yes | |
|
CARING | ||
|
CITIZENSHIP |
Yes |
IF THERE WERE ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS made by the officer
that you disagree with, please state them here and why:
Not sure. I keep thinking about the collision with the Ambit-6 and how it could have been avoided, but I don’t know that it could have been possible. We could have been less pro-active, I guess, and let the World Guard do it and only assist them indirectly, but that doesn’t seem like the Starfleet way either.
ANY ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
CAPT Konieczko communicated really well with crew members on the bridge and with the USS October, which was also on the task force. They kept each other updated frequently and coordinated decisions.
IF AAR HAS BEEN FILED FOR THIS MISSION, please attach:
https://argo.ex-astris.net/t/aar-co-op-vanguard/30353691
https://argo.ex-astris.net/t/aar-co-op-october-4-june-2017/30349353
END OF REVIEW.